| Editorial Online Published: 01 Feb 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong? .
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| How to Cite this Article |
| Pubmed Style . Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong?. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2013; 2(4): 778-779. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2013.170120141 Web Style . Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong?. https://www.ijmsph.org/?mno=151513 [Access: October 10, 2025]. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2013.170120141 AMA (American Medical Association) Style . Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong?. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2013; 2(4): 778-779. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2013.170120141 Vancouver/ICMJE Style . Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong?. Int J Med Sci Public Health. (2013), [cited October 10, 2025]; 2(4): 778-779. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2013.170120141 Harvard Style (2013) Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong?. Int J Med Sci Public Health, 2 (4), 778-779. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2013.170120141 Turabian Style . 2013. Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong?. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 2 (4), 778-779. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2013.170120141 Chicago Style . "Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong?." International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health 2 (2013), 778-779. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2013.170120141 MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style . "Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong?." International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health 2.4 (2013), 778-779. Print. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2013.170120141 APA (American Psychological Association) Style (2013) Negative studies: Why should be they methodologically strong?. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 2 (4), 778-779. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2013.170120141 |
